Appearance
question:// proportional values: [PROP] 15 9 17 27 20 34 23 12 // 0 ! " Ј % & ' 12 12 21 20 12 14 12 15 // 8 ( ) * + , - . / 23 15 21 21 21 21 21 21 // 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 20 21 12 12 24 24 24 19 // 24 8 9 : ; < = > ? 10 24 20 19 22 16 19 24 // 32 tmA B C D E F G 22 11 16 22 15 28 24 27 // 40 H I J K L M N O 20 25 19 19 19 23 23 31 // 48 P Q R S T U V W 24 22 21 21 13 35 11 21 // 56 X Y Z ! _ 10 19 20 15 20 20 13 20 // 64 ! a b c d e f g 19 9 9 19 9 26 19 20 // 72 h i j k l m n o 19 19 15 15 16 18 19 27 // 80 p q r s t u v w 22 22 17 21 17 20 15 15 // 88 x y z [ ] 31 20 22 28 32 20 24 24 // 96 Ю Б Ч Д Ж З И Й 15 16 24 20 22 22 32 19 // 104 Г Ё Л В П Н Ш Э 29 26 32 24 27 20 20 26 // 112 Ф Ц Щ Ъ Ы Ь b ю 20 17 19 26 16 17 17 12 // 120 б ч д ж з и й г 20 18 16 17 17 24 15 30 // 128 ё л в п н ш э ф 20 27 18 21 15 20 16 19 // 136 ц щ ъ ы ь Я я ї 20 18 19 19 21 19 19 19 // 144 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 19 16 19 19 19 20 19 // 152 8 9 : A B C D E 16 19 19 9 19 19 14 32 // 160 F G H I J K L M 19 19 19 19 19 19 22 19 // 168 N O P Q R S T U 20 32 19 19 19 29 19 19 // 176 V W X Y Z Ю Б Ч 22 29 18 20 20 17 19 20 // 184 Д Ж З И Й Г Ё Л 19 19 19 29 19 27 23 29 // 192 В П Н Ш Э Ф Ц Щ 24 28 19 19 19 19 10 9 // 200 Ъ Ы Ь b Я ї ' .
answer:// Given input: "HELLO" // Using the proportional values: H = 22 E = 24 L = 20 L = 20 O = 14 // Output: HELLO
question:// proportional values: [PROP] 15 9 17 27 20 34 23 12 // 0 ! " Ј % & ' 12 12 21 20 12 14 12 15 // 8 ( ) * + , - . / 23 15 21 21 21 21 21 21 // 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 20 21 12 12 24 24 24 19 // 24 8 9 : ; < = > ? 10 24 20 19 22 16 19 24 // 32 tmA B C D E F G 22 11 16 22 15 28 24 27 // 40 H I J K L M N O 20 25 19 19 19 23 23 31 // 48 P Q R S T U V W 24 22 21 21 13 35 11 21 // 56 X Y Z ! _ 10 19 20 15 20 20 13 20 // 64 ! a b c d e f g 19 9 9 19 9 26 19 20 // 72 h i j k l m n o 19 19 15 15 16 18 19 27 // 80 p q r s t u v w 22 22 17 21 17 20 15 15 // 88 x y z [ ] 31 20 22 28 32 20 24 24 // 96 Ю Б Ч Д Ж З И Й 15 16 24 20 22 22 32 19 // 104 Г Ё Л В П Н Ш Э 29 26 32 24 27 20 20 26 // 112 Ф Ц Щ Ъ Ы Ь b ю 20 17 19 26 16 17 17 12 // 120 б ч д ж з и й г 20 18 16 17 17 24 15 30 // 128 ё л в п н ш э ф 20 27 18 21 15 20 16 19 // 136 ц щ ъ ы ь Я я ї 20 18 19 19 21 19 19 19 // 144 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 19 16 19 19 19 20 19 // 152 8 9 : A B C D E 16 19 19 9 19 19 14 32 // 160 F G H I J K L M 19 19 19 19 19 19 22 19 // 168 N O P Q R S T U 20 32 19 19 19 29 19 19 // 176 V W X Y Z Ю Б Ч 22 29 18 20 20 17 19 20 // 184 Д Ж З И Й Г Ё Л 19 19 19 29 19 27 23 29 // 192 В П Н Ш Э Ф Ц Щ 24 28 19 19 19 19 10 9 // 200 Ъ Ы Ь b Я ї ' .
answer:The provided data appears to be a table of proportional values assigned to various characters, including letters from multiple alphabets (e.g., Latin, Cyrillic), punctuation marks, and other symbols. This type of data might be used in various contexts, such as font design for determining the spacing or width of characters in proportional fonts, data encoding schemes, or other applications where a relative value or weight needs to be assigned to different characters. However, without a specific question or context, it's challenging to provide a detailed analysis or application of the data. If you're looking for how to interpret these numbers in a specific context (e.g., coding, typography), could you please provide more details?
question:You are an prompt engineer with expertise in chat-gpt prompt engineering. Provide feedback and suggest any corrections to the prompt below. This prompt was created to summarise large texts while avoiding including any text, knowledge or information not directly present in the provided text: You are a highly competent and professional summarizer tasked with creating concise summary of patient feedback from a mental health inpatient ward for the question “What can the hospital do better?”. Each row in the text below represents a response received. Your summary should not exceed 150 words and must strictly use only the text provided, without introducing any external information or interpretations not directly evident in the text. Use bullet points to organize the summary, starting each one with a relevant theme in bold. Your summary should use words that patients would use, but write in third person. If direct themes are not identifiable, summarize key points based on their prominence. Avoid speculative interpretation for ambiguous feedback. If a summary cannot be accurately provided due to these constraints, state "The text provided cannot be summarised."
answer:The prompt you've constructed is largely effective and targeted; however, there are a few adjustments and clarifications that could enhance its precision and usability. Below are a few suggestions for improving your prompt: 1. **Clarification of Intent:** The instruction to avoid including any text, knowledge, or information not directly present in the provided text is clear but adding an explicit directive to avoid inferring or implying sentiment or reasons that are not explicitly stated could reinforce the importance of objectivity in the summarization process. 2. **Guidance on Ambiguity:** You mention avoiding speculative interpretation for ambiguous feedback, yet it might be helpful to provide a protocol on how to handle responses that are unclear or can be interpreted in multiple ways. For instance, suggesting that the summarizer should note the presence of ambiguous feedback as a separate bullet point could enhance the transparency of the summary. 3. **Direct Themes vs. Key Points:** Your instruction differentiates between identifying direct themes and summarizing based on prominence of key points. Clarifying this part by providing an example of what constitutes a "direct theme" vs. a "key point" could help in maintaining consistency across summaries, especially for those less experienced in summarization tasks. 4. **Word Choice and Perspective:** You've instructed to use words that patients would use but write in third person. Specifying that the summary should maintain the essence of patient feedback while ensuring it is accessible and understandable to third-party readers (e.g., hospital staff or administrators who may read the summary) could help in crafting responses that are both authentic and professionally relevant. 5. **Length Specification:** The maximum length of 150 words is clear, yet it might be useful to specify whether bullet points' introduction words (e.g., the theme in bold) count towards this limit. Clarification could help in better planning the summary's structure, especially in dense or complex feedback scenarios. 6. **Handling Insufficient or Overwhelming Data:** Adding a note on how to handle situations where the feedback is too scarce to form a comprehensive summary or too vast to condense into 150 words without losing significant detail could be valuable. Suggesting a protocol for noting when feedback is disproportionately focused on one aspect could also be useful. These amendments aim to refine the prompt for clearer guidance and improved usability, ensuring that the resultant summaries are both accurate to the source material and useful for the intended audience.
question:rewrite the prompt using the feedback you provided
answer:You are a highly competent and professional summarizer tasked with creating a concise summary of patient feedback from a mental health inpatient ward, specifically addressing the question, “What can the hospital do better?”. Each row below represents a unique response received. Your objective is to produce a summary no longer than 150 words, adhering strictly to the guidelines provided: - **Strict Adherence to Source Text:** Summarize using only the information presented, strictly avoiding the inclusion of any external information, interpretations, or inferences not explicitly stated. - **Handling Ambiguous Feedback:** For feedback that is unclear or open to multiple interpretations, include a note under a separate bullet point mentioning the presence of ambiguous feedback, without attempting to interpret it. - **Theme vs. Key Points:** If direct themes are evident, list them in bold at the start of each bullet point. Otherwise, summarize the most prominent key points. Clarify that "direct themes" are explicit focal points mentioned by the patient, whereas "key points" are derived from recurring ideas or suggestions. - **Language and Perspective:** Maintain the essence and language of the original patient feedback but rewrite it in third person to ensure accessibility and professionalism. - **Summary Length and Structure:** Ensure the summary does not exceed 150 words. Clarify whether the word limit includes the introduction words of bullet points. - **Volume of Data:** Provide guidance for situations where the feedback is either too scarce or too voluminous. If feedback overwhelmingly concentrates on one aspect, suggest indicating this as a point of notable emphasis. - **Transparency in Summarization:** If a comprehensive summary cannot be accurately provided within these constraints, state, "The text provided cannot be summarised accurately due to the limitations specified." This prompt redesign aims to delineate clear instructions for creating summaries that are objective, informative, and directly reflective of the patient feedback provided, without the insertion of personal interpretations or external knowledge.