Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:Could we be explicit that meaning and ideologies/traditions are what's talked about in that verse just like the original? I'd like that to be very clear to the reader and I feel the original accomplised that. I like the notion of writing a story together but I feel that's less holistic than the original which was permeating and whole "our paths and souls" interweaving rather than just a story Hmm, now that I think about it, personally I feel when it comes to longevity of the connection and hard work, I tend to really dig into a person and psychoanalyse them in a way. I feel like through time and communication we will simply know each other like the back of our hand and just wouldn't be all that surprised and THIS all-encompassing understanding is what would have the connection resilient to both internal, external circumstances or the storms if you will. Maybe that would be better to emphasise because truth be told I am not that patient with people who are closed off, I feel most comfortable when I can pry into someone's mind and they are honest with me and I am honest with them and we both get emotionally fully vulnerable and "naked" with each other. Does that make sense? Of course this can all take time naturally, especially for introverts who might need more time to open up but I'd like to see an inkling of that at the beginning to see that the potential is there rather than promise patience from the beginning.

answer:Certainly, it’s key that the poem reflects your values and expectations clearly. Let’s adjust the stanzas to be explicit about the meaning and ideologies, and to resonate with your emphasis on deep understanding in relationships. For the stanza on transcending traditional milestones and building a relationship based on shared values: "Kids and rings – they're not our foundation or cause, Our love will find meaning in shared values, not laws. Past ideologies and traditions, we write our own rhymes, Intertwining paths and souls, creating our times." This stanza maintains the directness about family and marriage, while clarifying the preference for a relationship built on mutual understanding and personal connection rather than societal expectations. Regarding the stanza on the nature of your connection and its evolution: "Beyond the butterflies, our bond won't rely on skies always fair, Day in, day out, revealing our depths, layer by layer. We'll delve into minds, in a mutual quest to truly understand, Finding strength in our naked honesty, hand in hand." This version speaks to your desire for a relationship that thrives on open and honest communication from the outset. It emphasizes a deep mental connection and emotional vulnerability, which you find essential in creating a resilient partnership. This approach should indicate to readers that you value clarity and depth in a relationship, rather than a slow and indefinite process. It's about finding someone who is willing to engage in the kind of openness that you find fundamental, and portrays your compatibility with someone who is ready for that level of intimacy and self-revelation.

question:I tweaked the original a little bit, does this flow better? Let's not have kids or scripts, but have our own love and meaning, We don't need ideologies or sins, to dictate how we should be feeling. Let us have just our paths interweave and just our souls intertwine, Let us have our own peace of mind. As for the "butterflies" stanza, I read back the poem again and I feel the second stanza already talks about understanding depths and minds and so I don't think maybe it's good to waste the space repeating notion of understanding again. I honestly had girls message me and be a bit anxious about admitting they are more clingy/needy but I quite like that so maybe it would be good to capture that I don't mind being 24/7 with my special someone, this would cover something new in the poem alongside the theme of communication in this stanza.

answer:The tweaks you've made to the "kids" stanza have streamlined it and the flow does feel more natural. Here’s your revised stanza: "Let's not have kids or scripts, but have our own love and meaning, No need for ideologies or sins to prescribe what we're feeling. Just our paths interwoven, and our souls to intertwine, Cultivating peace of mind as yours melds softly into mine." This version maintains the straightforward message of personal connection over societal expectations, while the use of "prescribe" reinforces the rejection of imposed ideologies. Regarding the "butterflies" stanza, it's a good idea to introduce new elements that complement the existing themes rather than repeat them. If you want to convey that you're open to a partner's emotional needs and the idea of being closely connected, you might consider something like: "But past the initial wonder, our skies won't always be serene. Day in, day out, we'll share life’s scenes, openly seen. Close in thought and in presence, we'll weather every storm, In our haven of conversation, where understanding is the norm." This version suggests that you're welcoming to a partner who desires closeness and expresses the value you place on open communication and shared experiences. It hints at the willingness to be there for each other consistently and to face challenges together without losing sight of the personal connection that brings comfort and understanding. This stanza speaks to the closeness you’re open to providing, acknowledges the ongoing nature of relationship communication, and suggests a sanctuary-like quality to the connection you hope to build.

question:I have implemented your changes: Let's not have kids or scripts, but have our own love and meaning, No need for ideologies or sins to prescribe what we should be feeling. Just our paths interwoven, and our souls to intertwine, but the last line in your revision doesn't feel right. We could do something poetic that doesn't rhyme for a profound impact, I've seen poems break the rhyme before for impact but I don't know how the formal technique is called, what do you think? For the "butterflies" stanza hmm I don't like "serene" and "haven", they're a bit less straightforward I like presence and close in thought though. We could literally use 24/7 or clingy/needy somehow

answer:It's great to hear that you've incorporated some of the previous feedback. To address your questions: **Breaking the Rhyme Scheme for Impact** The formal technique of breaking away from an established rhyme scheme for impact is often referred to as a volta, though commonly associated with sonnets, or it could be described more broadly as strategic enjambment. This is where a poet intentionally deviates from the rhythmic expectation to draw attention to a specific line or idea. If you wish to break the rhyme in the last line of the stanza about kids and scripts for impact, ensure that the line introduces a meaningful pause or revelation. Here's an example without a rhyme: "Just our paths interwoven, and our souls to intertwine, Discovering tranquil rhythms in the beat of 'us'—undefined." The last line breaks from the rhyme to highlight the significance of finding your unique pace as a couple, creating a profound effect. **Butterflies stanza with straightforward language** Regarding the stanza post-butterflies, if you'd like to incorporate terms like "clingy" or "24/7" to emphasize your comfort with closeness and to maintain straightforward language, here's an approach: "The thrill of the start may fade, yet we yearn not for skies always blue. Day in, day out, our connection thrives; I'll be your anchor, your 24/7 crew. Close in presence and thought, the storms we'll simply outlast, Cling to me as needed; in this bond, no shadows are cast." This version uses plain language to express your acceptance of a partner's need for emotional closeness and your readiness to be constantly supportive. It also continues the theme of enduring together and being a steadfast presence in each other’s lives.

question:Can you explain what your rhythm breaking line means? If even I am a bit confused maybe it's a bit too abstract haha I'm not sure anymore we should break the rhythm there since the poem is still going. It would be nice to have something reflective or pausing though I think because this is the last idealistic stanza, the next one grounds the poem in work that needs to be done. I think 24/7 crew is a bit too crude and pick up line-y, and the tone doesn't match the rest of the poem, Maybe we can skip 24/7 or to implement it more subtly. "we yearn for skies always blue" is too imposing, I don't know the person yet to talk about "we" and their attitude to change, maybe they thrive in change maybe they don't? I'd not use that phrasing. what does "no shadows are cast" mean here? I like that line but the semi-colon and rhythm seems strange to me

answer:Certainly, let's clarify and refine these points. The line "Discovering tranquil rhythms in the beat of 'us'—undefined" intended to convey a sense of calm and a rhythm that is unique to the relationship being undefined by societal norms. However, if it feels too abstract, we might consider a more direct and personal statement that caps the idea of defining your own love without being overtly reflective or pausing the flow. For the stanza that transitions from idealism to the realism of relationship work: "Just our paths interwoven, and our souls to intertwine, Together finding serenity, our shared rhythm divine." This pair of lines maintains the rhyme and reflects a positive forward movement, leading towards the idea that the relationship will have a peaceful yet unique cadence that the two of you will define together. As for the "butterflies" stanza, focusing on subtlety and avoiding presumptions about the reader's preferences are wise moves. Here's a revised version that incorporates your feedback: "The initial rush gives way, not to blue skies or tempest's touch, Day by day, our connection deepens, commitment's clutch. In your need for closeness, in constant thought and space, You'll find a steadfast partner, a comforting embrace." In this revision, "blue skies or tempest's touch" suggests an openness to change and acknowledges that the reader may have varying preferences. The word "clutch" is used metaphorically to represent commitment, while avoiding cruder or overtly dramatic phrases. The line "You'll find a steadfast partner, a comforting embrace" is directly addressing the reader, offering support and closeness without promising around-the-clock availability, subtly indicating that you're comfortable with their emotional needs. The phrase "no shadows are cast" is a more poetic way of saying that no doubts or fears will dim the relationship, but if the semi-colon and rhythm don't feel quite right, it's better to use a formulation that matches the established tone and flow of the poem.

Released under the Watson License.

has loaded